[Video] Q32: At this point, the writer is considering adding the following sentence. but in those with less active public spaces, anonymous enrollment was 2.4 percent and observable enrollment was 3.8 percent, a difference of only 1.4 percentage points. should the writer make this addition here?

Explanation for Question 32 From the Writing Section on the 2020 October Sat

So question number 32 is asking us about a sentence and if we should 2 include it in the paragraph. Now, 3 the sentence before says, 4 for example, in ULI study, sign-up rates were affected by the observability and 5 the location of where the sheet was placed. So one of the arguments of 6 this paragraph, right, is that sign up sheets are affected by where the sheet 7 is placed. So depending on where you put it, 8 you might get a different outcome. And then we go on to say the 9 condition or talk about the condition of high activity, 10 public spaces, right? And then the author suggesting that maybe then we talk about 11 less active public spaces. So we can ask ourselves, 12 does this make sense? And if we look at after choice a, 13 it says it uses information from the graph to acknowledge an opposite point of 14 view or an opposing point of view. 15 Now, remember this, isn't an opposing point of view because this is actually talking 16 about the argument, right? If we discuss this, 17 uh, condition versus this condition, we're showing the varying strength of the 18 signup sheets, which is right here in the topic sense, 19 the argument of the paragraph. So opposing views is wrong right now, 20 B because it provides accurate evidence from the graph to support the argument. 21 This is kind of like what I just said, right? The paragraphs argument is 22 that there's varying strength to the signup sheets. 23 And this does in fact show that right, because the low activity was weaker...