Explanation for Question 26 From the Reading Section on the 2019 May Sat
Question 26 asks which choice provides the best evidence for the answer to the 2 previous question. And we determined in an earlier video that the correct answer to 3 question 25 is going to be answered choice a that cut hill and Stephens 4 provided empirical evidence or empirical support for theres theory. 5 So let's look at the lines of evidence given to us as answer choices 6 in question 26 and see which one best supports that idea. 7 So again, the idea is that Cuthill and Stephens provided work that supported 8 theres theory. So if we look at answer choice, 9 a, it says with this and other ideas about animal markings, 10 there are in himself, the title of father of camouflage. 11 So answer choice a is going to be incorrect here. 12 It doesn't contain any mention of Cuthill and Stephens or their relationship to therre 13 and his work. So let's look at answer choice B. 14 It says, but although disruptive camouflage was cited in countless textbooks. 15 So disruptive camouflage is there's theory. 16 It remained largely untested until 2005 when in his Cuthill Martin Stevens and their 17 colleagues at the university of Bristol United Kingdom device and experiment using fake MOTS 18 made from paper triangles. So answer choice B looks like a good answer. 19 You haven't mentioned of both fairs theory and cut hill and Stephen's work, 20 and you can see that Cuthill and Stephen's work is empirical. 21 Empirical just means like experimental. And you can see here that they're designin...