Explanation for Question 25 From the Reading Section on the 2019 May Sat
Question 25 asks which choice best states the relationship between Cuthill and Stevens, 2 his work and theres work. So we can look back in the passage here 3 and see where the author references. 4 The relation between these two works. 5 Basically the transition between explaining Fair's theory and describing Cuthill 6 and Siemens is work and see what they have to say there. 7 So if we look, we can see that in that first introductory paragraph, 8 they are outlining theres theory, the painter and naturalist Abbott Henderson 9 therre suggested a different mechanism was at work. 10 So a mechanism of camouflage and it's outlined there in the rest of that 11 paragraph. And then you can see, well, 12 another thing is that theory is later titled disruptive camouflage. 13 So then in that second piece of evidence, that's highlighted there. 14 It says, but although disruptive camouflage. 15 So theres theory was cited in countless textbooks. 16 It remained largely untested until 2005 when Ines cut hill Martin Stevens and their 17 colleagues at the university of Bristol United Kingdom devise an experiment using fake 18 MOTS made from paper triangles. 19 So you can see here that basically what they're trying to explain is 20 that cut Hills Stevens and their colleagues provided the scientific 21 evidence. That first started to prove there's theory. 22 Now there's other studies outlined here that also work to better prove there's theory, 23 but cut Hills Stevens and their colleagues were lik...