Explanation for Question 36 From the Writing Section on the 2019 March Sat
Question number 36 is asking us how to combine the underlined 2 sentences. So taking a look at the sentence we have now, 3 it reads most zookeepers, 4 identify closely with their profession and consider their work morally important. 5 These findings about Sioux cavers are demonstrated in a study by business professors, 6 Jay syrup, Anderson and Jeffrey Thompson. 7 So what we want to do here is merge these two sentences effectively so 8 that we are able to convey both the source of these findings, 9 um, which is the study by these two business professors, 10 as well as the findings themselves, 11 which is that zookeepers identify with their profession and that they consider their work 12 morally important. So answer choice a, 13 um, we'll see is a little bit wordier than it needs to be. 14 In this case, it says two findings about zookeepers, 15 which are that most identified closely with their profession and consider their work morally 16 important are demonstrated in a study. 17 So we don't need this detail. Two findings about zookeepers. 18 The audience will see those two findings for themselves in that next little phrase. 19 So that initial phrase is not necessary. 20 It makes the answer choice longer than it needs to be. 21 And for that reason, we eliminate it answer choice base as a study by 22 business professors, Jay Stewart, 23 Benderson and Jeffrey Thompson, a study that focused on zookeepers demonstrates that most zookeepers 24 identify closer to their profession. So...