Explanation for Question 33 From the Writing Section on the 2017 May Sat
Question 33 assets to stay, 2 um, a conclusion that reader it's the main idea expressing the passage. 3 So to do that with, to think a little bit about what the main 4 idea is, this passage talks about, 5 um, you know, a work of art that wasn't considered or recognized as art. 6 Um, and that shifts towards securing that recognition, 7 which included a court case with the us government. 8 So based on that, we know when you're an answer choice that talks about, 9 um, or it's being recognized, 10 so wider range of art being recognized. 11 And it also needs to include probably is probably that court ruling let's read 12 the answer choices and determine which one does that. 13 So we have a meant that the public had finally come to recognize the 14 artistic value of non representational art. 15 I think the main thing there is that we don't talk about the us 16 government. 17 It's more about the public and that's not necessarily the main idea of the 18 passage B says a great victory for our collectors, 19 like station, a major impediment of their ability to import artworks from Europe had 20 been eliminated. I don't think that's the main idea at all. 21 That might be like a supporting detail from one of the paragraphs, 22 but it's not the main idea. See what forever brought on the range of 23 are acknowledged by the us government from then on possum laws would recognize both 24 abstract and traditional works within the category of art. 25 I think that's great. It talks about the U S...