Explanation for Question 32 From the Writing Section on the 2017 May Sat
For question 32, we have a very similar task as question 31, 2 and now we want to choose the correct form of the underlined section and 3 keep it in the most concise way possible. 4 Um, the unknown section says the court's ruling was in 5 favor of Brancusi. There's nothing wrong about that. 6 Um, if you notice all the answer choices, 7 say something very similar, but in a different order and some are shorter or 8 longer than others. So none of these are gonna sound or look wrong right 9 off the bat, but there might just be a better way of saying it 10 here, even though it all sounds, it looks pretty good. 11 This part right here, the court's ruling wasn't favor. 12 It's kind of, it kind of goes around in circles. 13 So we're not going to knock it right off the bat. We're going to 14 keep it in mind. Then we have B the ruling of the court. 15 Wasn't favor of Brancusi. Again, 16 it's still explanation to a, it's not really wrong, 17 but we have even, I would say a little bit more in circles than 18 a, like the court's ruling was in favor or the ruling of the court 19 has just not necessary to use all those words. 20 Then we have seen the court ruled in favor of Brancusi that one's sweeter. 21 It's more concise. It says the same exact thing. 22 And then do you, Brancusi was the favorable receiver of the court's ruling. 23 That's definitely like weird and redundant and has too many words like 24 the favorable receiver. No, he just wanted the ruling, 25 but it's too much. It was d...