Explanation for Question 29 From the Reading Section on the Official Sat Practice Test 10
It's been 29, says it can reasonably be inferred that one of the intended 2 goals of the 1999 experiment was to determine the what. 3 So we can go back into the passage and get some context for this 4 experiment. Starting in line 37, 5 it says the group looked more closely at the characteristics of the slow fibers 6 they named these low threshold nerves, C tactile or CT fibers. 7 So it's about CT fibers non-specifically. 8 And then if we look at starting in line 50, 9 this is going to be the conclusion they found to this experiment. 10 So it says a Lawson and his colleagues decided that these fibers must be 11 conveying a different dimension of sensory information than fast conducting fibers. 12 So we can take this conclusion and we can match it to the answer 13 choices in question 29. 14 What's your asking? What is the guiding question of the experiment 15 or what is the goal of the experiment? So again, 16 this says a Lawson and his colleagues decided that these fibers must be conveying 17 a different dimension of sensory information than fast conducting fibers. 18 So if we look at answer choice a, it says that they're trying to 19 determine the precise nature of sensations that CT fibers can convey. 20 Now that's a good broad answer choice here. 21 And it goes along with what is said in the conclusion in the passage 22 that there, the precise nature of sensations of slow 23 fibers is different than that, of fast fibers, 24 which they know things about specifically. 25 They...