[Video] Q38: A) no change or b) strong winds could be resisted by this “tube-within-a-tube” layout, reducing or c) resistance to strong winds could result from this “tube-within-a-tube” layout, thereby reducing or d) there could be resistance to strong winds by this “tube-within-a-tube” layout and a reduction in

Explanation for Question 38 From the Writing Section on the 2021 May Sat (International)

Hey guys. So question 38 is going to be a conciseness and all we 2 need to do here is purely get the right answer that lets us use 3 the least amount of actual wording. 4 So what we seem to be trying to say here is with support at 5 both center and perimeter. This the two within a tube layout will re 6 uh, resist strong lens and reduce the need for space consuming columns. 7 So only to say that the tube within a tube layout could resist strong 8 winds and reduce blank. That's all we needed to say. 9 So, um, already it seems like antitrust a seems to be fitting pretty well 10 in getting us the answer. Clearly let's work from the bottom and go off 11 to see if these are the answer choices are removable. 12 Option D says there could be resistance to strong winds by this tube within 13 a tube layout and a reduction in blank. 14 So this seems to just be adding in on necessary wording. 15 There could be resistance to strong winds by this tube within a tube layout 16 and a reduction in, instead of saying like a reduction in, 17 we should just say, uh, reduce, um, 18 when we're saying there could be resistance and, 19 or reduction we're, um, using unnecessary language, 20 uh, to like shift from where w instead of saying, 21 just like things like consuming or, 22 um, uh, resisting or reducing, 23 we're shifting it to say a resistance or reduction, 24 which just adds unnecessary wording. And should I see says the resistance of 25 strong winds could resolve from this to within the too l...