Answer Choices
A) offer an alternative interpretation of Abzhanov and Bhullar's evidence as described in the passage.
B) preview upcoming research that may support the findings in the study analyzed in the passage.
imply that the sponsors of the study analyzed in the passage might have influenced its results.
challenge the underlying intentions of the researchers described in the passage.
Explanation for Question 30 From the Reading Section on the 2021 May Sat (International)
Hey guys. So question 30 says the last paragraph, 2 mainly functions to blank. So let's go back and reread the last paragraph and 3 think, what is it doing for us? And this paragraph says a developmental 4 biologist. Also worries that the changes in facial structure observed by the Harvard team 5 may stem from unintended cell death caused by the inhibitors that used adding 6 the fossil records to this work is really important step. 7 But I think that they were just looking at the wrong pathway. 8 He says I was in the album viewer counter that F G F eight 9 and SHA aids are often co-expressed and they work together. 10 So what this is telling us is that Mercutio is saying that this study 11 that we've been talking about throughout the whole passage and the study as a 12 whole, it has these certain potential issues with it. 13 And that's why they should maybe view the results differently because of this. 14 That's what Markeesha was saying here. And that's the brunt of the final paragraph, 15 where, and then it comes in and says, well, these guys are saying that 16 this because of this, but it's offering this, 17 you know, an alternative viewpoint from our tissue is saying, 18 you know, maybe it's this, maybe that's what's going on. So let's start from 19 the bottom of workup. It says challenged, 20 the underlying intentions of the researchers describing the passage. 21 That's not challenging the intention and Rakisha isn't saying that these guys were biased 22 or they were ly...