[Video] Q27, 28: It can reasonably be inferred from the passage that if further research demonstrated that dna photolyase protected the high-altitude frogs from bap-induced dna damage, then pacific tree frogs shoul and which choice provides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question?

Explanation for Questions 27, 28 From the Reading Section on the 2020 March Sat

Okay, so number 27 says it can reasonably be bird from the passage that 2 if further research demonstrated that DNA Lidl days protected the high-altitude frogs from 3 VAP induce DNA damage that this fig tree rocks should. 4 What, um, so what we see here is 5 that if, you know, if DNA totally is did indeed, 6 that was indeed the reason why these frogs, 7 um, we protected from the sun. 8 Remember if it's bap and D may damage BHP, 9 is it we'll see in the passage over here, 10 it is something that's done in cigarettes, right? So it's, 11 it's an industrial pollutant in, 12 it's an ancient toxicant. So if you're protected from GHG, 13 then you're protected from pollution you're protected from, 14 you know, that chemicals, things like that. 15 So we'd expect that those products are also protected from pollution, 16 um, which is exactly what it says that these frogs are going to be 17 protected from pollution now. Um, 18 because you know, bap is pollution. 19 So it's asking for, you know, the evidence for that question, 20 which we saw was like right over here. 21 Um, it's like number 60, 22 like 1 64 should be in there. 23 Oh, okay. We have, we have two options that are kind of close. 24 So let's, let's read both of them. 25 S 63, 64 and 60, 60, 70. 26 Okay. So, so if he's there 64 is here, 27 says I'm interested in other ways, 28 frogs, my experience do that. And he studied the effects of VAP, 29 which is a well-characterized carcinogen. 30 Um, that's found in cigarette smoke. Ok...

All Test Answers +

Online SAT Prep Tutoring

1-on-1 SAT and ACT tutoring with an expert SoFlo Tutor via Zoom

BOOST MY SCORE