Explanation for Question 39 From the Reading Section on the 2019 May Sat
Question 39 asks which choice provides the best answer breasts evidence 2 for the answer to three is question. Sorry. So let's look at that last 3 question we determined in an earlier video that the correct answer here is going 4 to be answer choice C that passage to most strongly suggests that a significant 5 flaw of the universal declaration of human rights is that it presents the rights 6 such that they let clear and precise application. 7 So let's look at the lines of evidence given to us as answer choices 8 in question 39 and see which one best supports this idea. 9 So we're looking for the clearest indication of a lack of clarity. 10 So we'll start with answer choice a so all of these are kind of 11 meshed together here. Answer choice a is 85 through 87. 12 So you can't see it. So this answer choice says the weaknesses 13 that would go on to undermine human rights law were there from the start. 14 So this does have an element describing a weakness of this declaration, 15 but it doesn't say anything about a lack of clarity. 16 So answer choice a would be incorrect. If we look at answer choice B 17 lines, 87 through 89, the sentence says the universal declaration was not a treaty 18 in the formal sense. No one at the time believed that it created legally 19 binding obligations. So in this case, 20 that's not really going to indicate any idea of like 21 a lack of clarity right here. 22 It's pretty clear that people believe this declaration 23 didn't foresee legally binding...