Explanation for Question 30 From the Reading Section on the 2019 May Sat
Question 30 asks, which choice provides the best evidence for the answer to the 2 previous question. So we determined in an earlier video that the correct answer 3 for question 29 was going to be answered choice a that in the passage, 4 the author suggests that humans and non-human predators may differ in their ability to 5 perceive visual patterns. So let's look at the lines of evidence given to us 6 as answer choices in question 30 and see which one best goes 7 along with this idea. So we're looking for, I mentioned of humans and non-human 8 predators, and we're looking for some idea of differences in visual 9 perception. So we'll start with answer choice a, 10 it says he found that more patches, 11 the more patches Motts had on their edges, the more often volunteers feel to 12 notice them. And they needed to fixate their gaze on them for longer to 13 have any chance of spotting them. 14 So answer choice a is going to be incorrect. 15 You have the elements of humans and visual perception, 16 but there's no comparison really outlined here. 17 So you can't even indirectly infer that any of this is related 18 to the non-human predators. So then if we look at answer choice B, 19 it says, although instructive the experiment had an obvious shortcoming. 20 Humans do not pray on months, let alone computer generated ones to test whether 21 disruptive coloring fools its intended audience Stephen's had or has 22 started field trials. So in this case, 23 you see the elements, you see h...