[Video] Q25: No change or technology- or technology. it or technology, which

Explanation for Question 25 From the Writing Section on the 2018 May Sat

Question number 25, asks us about how to combine 2 two parts of the sentence. Um, 3 the sentence overall reads. It was not until 2007 that a study by 4 Nico DeClerck and Cindy Kaiser of the Georgia Institute of technology demonstrated 5 that the theater stating arrangement is the source of its excellent acoustics. 6 So the way the sentence reads now, 7 um, a study by these two individuals at the Georgia Institute of technology 8 demonstrated the theaters seating arrangement, 9 blah, blah, blah. Um, there's nothing really wrong with the way this is set 10 up now. Um, we don't need to set aside this detail about where they're 11 from since that's sort of how they're being introduced, 12 they're being introduced as Nico and Cindy of the Georgia Institute. 13 Um, so it wouldn't make sense to set aside George Institute. 14 Um, that's how they're being introduced. They're being introduced as being of the Institute 15 rather than it being sort of a additional fact or unnecessary detail 16 that that is where they're from. 17 So we don't really need to separate that detail out in any way. 18 We can kind of just include that in the main body of the sentence, 19 without any commas, dashes periods, 20 anything like that, or no change option is really best here, 21 but let's work through the other answer choices as well. 22 Answer choice B uses a dash. 23 Um, there's no need to use the dash here. 24 Uh, the dash can be used sometimes to create a dramatic effect. 25 Um, but in this case, t...