Answer Choices
A) NO CHANGE
and its staff, at 67,600 full-time employees, was significantly smaller.
17 percent, at a lesser cost of $3,628 per full-time employee.
and it paid its full-time employees $17 per hour compared with its competitor’s $10 per hour.
Explanation for Question 41 From the Writing Section on the 2018 April Sat
Hey guys. So question 41 says the writer wants to include relevant information from 2 the table to illustrate the point made in the first part of the sentence, 3 which choice best accomplished this goal. So the questions like this, 4 usually all the answer choices are going to actually be accurate based on the 5 graph, but we need to figure out which is the piece of relevant information, 6 as opposed to which is the piece of accurate information, 7 which we were doing in the sentence previous. So this says, 8 he found the researcher found that turnover rate the higher paying his club 9 store company B because we know it's higher paying because of the higher estimated 10 average hourly, um, that the turnover rate was lower dash 11 something. So he's saying the turnover rate was lower and we're overall talking about 12 how this lower turnover rate with higher pay is going to cost the companies 13 less. 14 So option a says, the from 67,000 full-time employees made an average of 15 $17 per hour. This doesn't really connect to what we're trying to say. 16 We're trying to set the turnover rate is lower. That's what we're saying in 17 the first part of it. So we need to find one, that's saying it's 18 a 17% as when it talks about the other one. 19 It's 14% visas and its staff at 67,600 full-time 20 employees was significantly smaller. This again is not talking about the lower turnover rate. 21 These CSO 17% that lower turnover rate at a lesser cost of this much 22 money per full-time employee. So this is saying what we need to say in 23 this argument. The turnover rate is this much lower it's this much lower percentage 24 it's making the company have this much less cost thesis. 25 And it paid this full-time employee 17 per hour, 26 compared with competitors. Once again, this is not talking about the turnover rate, 27 so we're not going to pick that option.