Explanation for Question 27 From the Writing Section on the 2017 May Sat
Question 27, asked us to, 2 um, give a second supporting example. 3 That is similar to the example already in the sentence. 4 So we want to read the sentence, read the first example and kind of 5 find another example that matches the, 6 um, kind of like the tone and the style. 7 Um, and the point of that first example. 8 So the sentence reads one newspaper, 9 likened it to half an airplane propeller while blank. 10 So half an airplane propeller, this example is relating the sculpture 11 to, um, or not to art at all. 12 It's giving the sculpture the purpose of something else, 13 right? Like an airplane propeller, but it's saying it's half an hour per appropriately. 14 So in this case, it's saying that, 15 um, it can't do something or it's a bad example or bad 16 product of something. Now we want to choose another answer 17 choice that compares the sculpture to 18 something similar like that. 19 The first answer choice is also calling it a tall slender, 20 highly polished object. So this answer chores is definitely, 21 um, the tell us, I know how to patch up with, 22 first of all, it doesn't sound as negative as the first one, 23 and it's still, it's kind of relating it to art. 24 It's not like the first example that doesn't relate to art at all. 25 So I'm going to cross that one out for now. We have as B, 26 another Moffitt is an expensive potato masher. 27 So this one definitely isn't related to art. 28 It's talking about another purpose that it could have, 29 and if we have ...