Explanation for Question 6 From the Reading Section on the 2017 May Sat
Question six says which choice provides the best evidence for the answer to the 2 previous question. So we determined in an earlier video and you can see that 3 there, that the correct answer to question five. 4 The previous question reference here is that a meaningful irony in the passage is 5 that while the narrator had admired the young suit Swedes accomplishment, 6 this we'd appreciated the narrative's accomplishments as an adult. 7 So let's look at the lines of evidence given to us as answer choices 8 in question six and see which one best supports that idea. 9 So we're looking for some element of the Swedes appreciation 10 for the narrator and some element of maybe the narrative's appreciation 11 for sweet. So if we start with answer choice a, 12 it says the two, clearly a father and his son were laughing about something 13 together when I approached and introduce myself. 14 So it kind of goes into that next piece, but answer choice is going 15 to be incorrect because you don't see any element of admiration for the narrator 16 here. 17 You merely see him kind of observing the Swede and 18 then you do see him going to introduce himself, 19 but you don't really see the sweet reaction to that. So answer choice a 20 would be incorrect. If we look at answer choice B, 21 it says, so you're the guy my mother says, 22 and he was such a nice quiet child. When he came to the house, 23 you know who, this is the sweet said to the boy, the guy who 24 wrote those books, Nathan Zucker...