Explanation for Question 42 From the Reading Section on the 2017 April Sat
Question number 42 asks us for evidence for the answer to the previous question, 2 which is of course, number 41 here we selected answer choice. 3 B Henry would have responded to Pendleton's claim about the members of the convention 4 by asserting that they should not have proposed an entirely new form of government. 5 Um, recall the evidence that I use for this question, 6 um, at the end of Henry's passage, 7 the federal convention ought to have amended the old system for this purpose. 8 They were solely delegated, so lines 39 to 41 speak 9 directly to what he felt that the purpose should have been, 10 um, and how the members of the federal convention ought to have restrained themselves 11 so way to amending the old system rather than creating a new one. 12 Um, so let's see, first that is one of the possible answer choices that 13 should be answer choice C our correct answer. 14 Um, the other answer choices blind six to 10, 15 11 to 13 and 42 to 46, 16 um, are not as applicable to question number 41. 17 Let's take a look at each of them and turn 18 Mayan six to 10 or up here. Um, 19 and here I would make this inquiry of those worthy characters who composed a 20 part of the lake federal convention. I'm sure they were fully impressed with the 21 necessity of forming a great consolidated government instead of a Confederation. 22 So this line, this is choice a, um, 23 this doesn't exactly speak to, 24 um, the, the feelings of Henry on whether these actions 25 were married in or ...